This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reorganize C statement parsing

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:34:27 -0700
Subject: Re: Reorganize C statement parsing
References: <20040624231954.GA16988@twiddle.net><Pine.LNX.4.58.0406250905010.27956@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20040626001754.GB24005@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:13:35AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> 
>> > 	* c-parse.in: Update expected conflicts.
>> 
>> I take it all conflicts not involved in error recovery have been examined
>> in the Bison dumps to ensure they aren't resolved incorrectly?
>
> Yes.  They're all in/under if_statement.  We get conflicts shifting
> ';' and IF vs reducing save_location associated with lineno_stmt.

Now that we have EXPR_LOCUS, surely a lot of the save_location rules
can be eliminated?

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reorganize C statement parsing
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Reorganize C statement parsing
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Reorganize C statement parsing
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Reorganize C statement parsing
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]