This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Patch ping - gcc include file cleanups


Add include guards to conditions.h:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01057.html

Add include guards and missing dependency to cselib.h:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01364.html

Add include guards and missing dependency to c-incpath.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00396.html

Add missing dependency to gcov-io.h:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01275.html

Add missing dependency to basic-block.h:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01044.html

Do patches purely adding include guards really require approval? That
seems like a dead-obvious change to me, but doesn't appear to be covered
in http://gcc.gnu.org/cvswrite.html#policies

Thank you.

//Mark



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]