This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR/16105

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:36:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR/16105
References: <C11FDFB2-C3DE-11D8-B981-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20040622000136.GA1831@redhat.com> <036A0E26-C3E0-11D8-B981-000393A91CAA@apple.com>

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:06:30PM -0700, Devang Patel wrote:
> Does this mean nobody should rely on type of MODIFY_EXPR ?

When looking at GIMPLE, yes.

It's of course meaningful when looking at GENERIC because
of "x = y = 0".


r~

References:
- [PATCH] PR/16105
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [PATCH] PR/16105
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] PR/16105
  - From: Devang Patel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]