This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] RTL prologue/epilogue for SPARC
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- To: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:25:17 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFC] RTL prologue/epilogue for SPARC
- References: <200406150026.29387.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20040618131625.6e57d3a2.davem@redhat.com>
> I think the gains of backend maintainability and cleanliness outweigh
> the one regression you mentioned, the lack of delay slot filling in
> one specific case.
Agreed. I'll do again the comparison for gcc.c-torture/compile and take a
quick look at the regression (and probably open a PR to track it).
> As long as it passes regression tests, I would recommend merging this
> sooner rather than later.
Does this count as an approval? The patch affects the platform-independent
code in a minor albeit non-trivial way I think:
- the concept of "late prologue/epilogue",
- the reorg.c bits.
--
Eric Botcazou