This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran][wwwdocs] A few updates to the gfortran pages.
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: GCC Fortran mailing list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>,patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:28:59 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [gfortran][wwwdocs] A few updates to the gfortran pages.
- References: <40C9E7DE.8060004@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <40C9E83A.4080807@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Index: compilerstatus.html
===================================================================
<h2 id="be">Middle end and Back end</h2>
Gfortran uses the middle end and back end of GCC, more specifically, it is
-built on the <a href="../projects/tree-ssa/">Tree-SSA</a> branch
-of GCC, which is meant to become part of GCC 3.5. We hope to be able to
-include at least a beta version of gfortran into GCC by this time.
+built on the current development branch which will become GCC 3.5. We
+hope to be able to include at least a beta version of gfortran into
+GCC by this time.
Given that gfortran is part of the tree, it probably will be included
in the release in any case, so I'd rephrase this a bit.
Index: index.html
===================================================================
+and help test gfortran. Gfortran is developed as part of GCC, the GNU
+Compiler Collection. We provide read access to our development sources
+via <a href="../cvs.html">anonymous CVS</a>.
+<a href="../snapshots.html">Snapshots</a> of the compiler sources are
+also prepared regularly.
How about "via anonymous CVS, rsync, and FTP snapshots <full stop>",
with appropriate links?
We also have a mailing list which is <a
+href="../ml/gfortran">archived</a>, and you can subscribe to it on the
+<a href="../lists.html#subscribe">lists page</a>.</p>
Please mention the actual name of the mailing list here. :-)
Index: librarystatus.html
===================================================================
This part of the patch is okay, under the assumption that you know what
you are doing. :-)
Gerald