This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Cc: kargls at comcast dot net, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:14:38 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
References: <20040613101605.764109fa.kargls@comcast.net> <40CC9427.5070503@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

Tobias Schlüter wrote:

Steven G. Kargl wrote:
2004-06-13  Steven G. Kargl  <kargls@comcast.net>
     * random.c (random_r4): Burn a random number
       (random_r8): fix infinite loop.
I committed this under the obviously correct rule.

Actually, I take the word 'obviously' back. Shouldn't the check compare to 1.0 given that our random numbers are meant to be in the interval [0,1(?

- Tobi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequences consistent
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
  - From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]