This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH mingw32 MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX was a bad idea.

From: Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>
To: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaronraolete36 at aaronwl dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:08:16 +0200
Subject: Re: PATCH mingw32 MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX was a bad idea.
References: <40C924EA.30101@aaronwl.com> <20040611041401.GA19370@nevyn.them.org> <40C9780C.9040203@aaronwl.com>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:14:52AM -0500, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
> So, would it be appropriate to add the target macros 
> STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_1 and STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_2?  They make 
> more sense as macros than hooks because standard_startfile_prefix_1 and 
> standard_startfile_prefix_2 are const.

  FWIW, thats a modification the AmigaOS port (not in the FSF repository)
  does. It does also invent STANDARD_EXEC_PREFIX_[12].

  Gunther

Follow-Ups:
- PATCH mingw32 STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_[12] (Re: PATCH mingw32 MD_STARTFILE_PREFIXwas a bad idea.)
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise

References:
- PATCH mingw32 MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX was a bad idea.
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: PATCH mingw32 MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX was a bad idea.
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: PATCH mingw32 MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX was a bad idea.
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]