This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: POT file for cpplib
- From: Karl Eichwalder <ke at gnu dot franken dot de>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,tp - Translation Project <translation at iro dot umontreal dot ca>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 06:09:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: POT file for cpplib
- References: <40BDA400.1000508@gnu.org> <40C6D071.5050009@gnu.org><shekop80xy.fsf@frechet.suse.de> <shk6ygk4pq.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de><Pine.LNX.4.58.0406100101480.1266@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk> writes:
> Whose responsibility is it to merge new translations of cpplib messages in
> gcc-3.4.x.pot (as translators will continue working on 3.4 branch gcc.pot
> for many months until 3.5 branches) into the cpplib domain?
If cpplib is also required for 3.4 I will create a separate record for
it (cpplib_3_4). ATM, it would matter if I would initialize it from the
existing gcc or cpplib files, I guess.
> When a new version is to be submitted to the TP (when 3.5 branches), does
> sending once the URL of a snapshot containing both gcc.pot and cpplib.pot
> suffice,
One message for both is enough; I have already a small shell script to
prepare the gcc archive file for processing; the archive traditionally
comes with two .pot files and this matter of fact "confuses" our
standard python script (fetch-pot).
> or do the instructions at <http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html>
> need changing to indicate that the same URL should be sent twice with two
> different subjects?
This file needs an overhaul for other reasons, IIRC.
--
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)