This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 28 GCC HEAD regressions, 7 new, with your patch on 2004-06-03T00:30:06Z.
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 03 Jun 2004 14:33:40 -0700
- Subject: Re: 28 GCC HEAD regressions, 7 new, with your patch on 2004-06-03T00:30:06Z.
- References: <20040603134113.7F13DF3931F3@gcc-regress.apple.com><E3A59E46-B56B-11D8-A236-000A95967F9E@physics.uc.edu>
Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
> On Jun 3, 2004, at 09:41, GCC regression checker wrote:
> > The new failures are:
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh31.C
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/init1.C
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p2736.C
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p9706.C
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.pt/overload11.C
>
> All of the above failures are target bugs in the darwin
> back-end and can be fixed by applying the rest of
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00113.html>.
>
>
>
> > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C
>
> This is a bug in the C++ front-end where there are two decls
> for some reason. One for the builtin function and one for the
> function that is there in the code. One way to fix this is to
> do what the C front does and only combine the decls.
The Darwin part of that patch is OK.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>