This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Giovanni Bajo<giovannibajo at libero dot it>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:13:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
References: <021801c4423c$dc3888a0$444e2a97@bagio><20040525112319.GF4736@devserv.devel.redhat.com><87oeocmokk.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com> <40B37E1C.8070303@redhat.com>

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>> My inclination is to approve Giovanni's patch and then work on adding
>> back ONLY those optimizations that can be demonstrated with hard
>> numbers to actually be optimizations.
>
> Go away and fix gcc.  Then we can talk.

Go away and prove to me glibc isn't broken.  Then we can talk.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]