This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] patch was: Re: Untabified and resubmitted: Patch togfortran PR13742

Victor Leikehman wrote:
This patch fails on the following (valid) testcase:

program main
common /a/ x
real :: x
print *,x
end
block data
common /a/ x
data x /1.2345/
end


It's funny that something this simple breaks, even though I could compile several packages without problems related to that patch. Looks like code which uses common blocks tends to also use implicit typing. Thanks for finding this.

I found another case I hadn't thought of in my patch. I'll submit an updated patch once I understood how to find the common block a symbol is associated with. Or does anybody know? Do I have to traverse all common blocks in a given namespace or is there a field in gfc_symbols which I didn't understand?

Thanks,
- Tobi

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]