This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] gcc: Fix comment typos.
- From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
- To: hp at bitrange dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 12:29:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [patch] gcc: Fix comment typos.
- References: <20040430.122745.93382596.kazu@cs.umass.edu><Pine.BSF.4.58.0405011042110.81053@dair.pair.com>
Hi H-P,
> You're "fixing typos" (actually adjusting spelling, from BE to
> AE) in a *quote*. Quotes should be left the way they are, or
> else they stop being quotes.
Oops. Thank you for pointing this out. Fixed thus.
Kazu Hirata
2004-05-01 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
* config/cris/cris.h: Revert my "fix comment typos" patch.
Index: cris.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/cris/cris.h,v
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -r1.72 cris.h
--- cris.h 30 Apr 2004 16:27:23 -0000 1.72
+++ cris.h 1 May 2004 16:23:29 -0000
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@
/* Whether or not to work around multiplication instruction hardware bug
when generating code for models where it may be present. From the
trouble report for Etrax 100 LX: "A multiply operation may cause
- incorrect cache behavior under some specific circumstances. The
+ incorrect cache behaviour under some specific circumstances. The
problem can occur if the instruction following the multiply instruction
causes a cache miss, and multiply operand 1 (source operand) bits
[31:27] matches the logical mapping of the mode register address