This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] grokdeclarator cleanup (newb patch)

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:34:21 -0700, Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> Note further that the %D in this 
>>
>>        error ("declarator-id missing; using reserved word `%D'", dname);
>>
>> is incorrect - %D takes a DECL node.  It should be %E.
>
> When I wrote the extended format code, %D was correct for the name of a
> decl.

dname here is an IDENTIFIER_NODE, not a DECL.

> %E is for expressions.  Has this changed?

Um.  In the C front end, %E is for IDENTIFIER_NODEs.  I should have
checked what it is in C++.

zw
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]