This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [committed] libada merge part 3: cleanups
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 04 16:15:51 EDT
- Subject: Re: [committed] libada merge part 3: cleanups
How are you building GCC?
make gnat1
You're somehow avoiding building libgcc I guess? (Just building until
the crash, perhaps?)
No, see above.
Well, anyway, 'make gnatlib' (make gnatlib-shared, make gnatlib-sjlj) in
"gcc/ada/" should still work as well as it did before
But I never used it there.
What was removed was doing the same thing in "gcc/".
That's the one I always use!
You can also try the following from the top level:
make -k configure-target-libada (builds GCC, then configures libada;
allows it to get past the failures while building GCC, which come from
the lack of an assembler)
But that builds *way* too much. I just want gnat1.
If you were doing 'make gnatlib' in "gcc/" *without* building GCC
first, I have other suggestions.
That's exactly what I *am* doing. I don't care if it blows up before compiling
stuff as long as it sets up the links.
However, "make gnatlib" in gcc/ada does seem to do the right thing. So
unless you're affecting that, it's true that removing it from gcc/
isn't a serious problem.