This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Fix PR 14470
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 15:41, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:39:40PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > I've already established that. My problem is with the pessimization
> > induced by Jason's preferred approach.
>
> Which was preferred? Personally I think the temporary for the
> index will probably work out best.
>
That's what I thought too. Jason then said he would actually prefer the
one that forces the gimplifier to create minimal lvalues for postfix
expressions (the one that creates the pointer arithmetic mess).
I would rather just have a temporary in the array index to avoid the
extra hassle.
Diego.