Re: [rfc] prototype altivec function overloading rewrite

[Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>]

> Comments?

I like this, possibly in the same way I like fancy whips and chains,
but nevertheless, it's better than crude and ugly whips and rusted
chains.

I assume we have to wait till tree-ssa to be merged in.  I would
like both implementations to co-exist while we convert everything from
the current implementation to a possible new approach.  Unless you
and/or Paolo are high on something and want to do the whole thing at
once.

We'll have to get our hands on the AltiVec testsuite.

> +   /* Not found.  Bitch.  */

:-)

> +   /* Was found.  Build an expression with the implementation builtin.
> +      Add casts as necessary for the arguments and the return type.  */

I *really* like that :-).  You are one sick man.

Thanks for looking into this.
Aldy