This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C


On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 23:54:59 +0100, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:

>> (But, is using abort() and exit(0) really part of our testsuite
>> standard?  I thought using return 0/return 1 was perfectly acceptable.
>> The change is OK, anyhow; that's just a side issue.)
>
> From sourcebuild.texi:
>
> "
> Test cases should use @code{abort ()} to indicate failure and
> @code{exit (0)} for success; on some targets these may be redefined to
> indicate failure and success in other ways.
> "

The C++ testsute has been using return 0/1 for quite a while; changing
testcases to use abort/exit is not necessary.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]