This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add.
- From: Fariborz Jahanian <fjahanian at apple dot com>
- To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, law at redhat dot com, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:19:05 -0800
- Subject: Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add.
- References: <200403260000.i2Q006MS004354@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <D763C8B4-7EB9-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>
On Mar 25, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
On Mar 25, 2004, at 4:00 PM, email@example.com wrote:
In message <A2195074-7EB6-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>, Dale
Well, there's an argument against it, all right, but the view that
it'sOR, those who do not want standard conforming code probably ought to
appears to be a minority one. It's clear that quite a few people
transformations useful. Those of you who want standard-conforming
don't have to use -ffast-math, after all.
using -ffast-math. I *much* prefer to keep the compiler standards
I think there is general agreement on that (without -ffast-math).
But Fariborz's change is done only with flag_unsafe_math_optimizations.
Yes. Just as many other transformations that are being done in the same