This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 16 Mar 2004 09:36:39 +0100
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <20040316003346.GA31411@twiddle.net><m3hdwp5qas.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><Pine.BSF.4.58.0403160931560.90675@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> writes:

| On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >| Applied mainline.  Ok for 3.3/3.4?
| > OK for gcc-3_3-branch.
| 
| I think we need to synchronize 3.3 and 3.4 a bit more: if we add a fix
| to 3.3, but not to 3.4, considering current release schedules, we will
| have a regression from 3.3.3 to 3.4.1.

I don't think so.  The fix (which is a regression fix) is not going to
be present in 3.3.3 since it is already out.  It is going to be 3.3.4
which will go out long after 3.4.0 is released.  And since it 
will be included in 3.4.1 or 3.4.0, it is not the kind of regression
you have in mind.  It would be unfortunate if 3.4.x would block the
kind of fixes that can go into 3.3.4.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535
  - From: Michael Matz

References:
- [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]