This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [csl-arm, HEAD] ARM PATCH - fix QImode addressing on ARMv4
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at buzzard dot freeserve dot co dot uk, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:01:15 +0000
- Subject: Re: [csl-arm, HEAD] ARM PATCH - fix QImode addressing on ARMv4
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
rearnsha@buzzard.freeserve.co.uk said:
> This patch fixes the way that we manage QImode indexes when compiling
> for ARM Architecture v4 or later. In v4 we have a ldrsb instruction
> that can sign-extend a byte load (ldrb zero-extends). Unfortunately
> the indexing capabilities of this insn are less flexible than its
> unsigned counterpart. In the past we have restricted (mostly) the
> indexing range of ldrb to that of its poorer cousin: that generates
> correct code, but at the expense of wasting instructions when the
> indexing exceeds the capabilities of ldrsb.
> The patch below addresses all this by introducing a new memory
> predicate arm_extendqisi_mem_op which can validate a ldrsb address
> index distinctly from an ldrb address index (it does so by calling
> arm_legitimate_address_p with a new argument, the 'outer' code in much
> the same way as the RTX_COST macros do.
I forgot to mention that the patch changes the memory constraint used for
VFP memory operands from U to 'Uv'. The constraint for an ldrsb
instruction is 'Uq'.
R.