This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
Cc: MUSTAFA at il dot ibm dot com, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu, ZAKS at il dot ibm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, roger at eyesopen dot com
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:39:18 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
References: <BC193AAE-6B3D-11D8-A692-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> <OF41C161B0.EAE1CA2C-ONC2256E4A.0077EA72-C2256E4A.00785818@il.ibm.com> <20040311.162733.26928265.kazu@cs.umass.edu>

>>>>> Kazu Hirata writes:

Kazu> Here is a slightly reduced testcase.  With -fgcse-after-reload,
Kazu> abort() is called.

	Did you look where abort() is called?  Is this a case where the
limited resources of h8300 prevent gcse-after-reload from working?  Maybe
this optimization needs to be disabled in OVERRIDE_OPTIONS for h8300.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
  - From: Kazu Hirata

References:
- Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
  - From: Mostafa Hagog
- Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
  - From: Kazu Hirata

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]