This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Powerpc64 long double support

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:23:36 -0500
Subject: Re: Powerpc64 long double support
References: <40491948.2010900@us.ibm.com> <20040306105033.GF2715@bubble.modra.org> <200403062313.i26NDipA015313@desire.geoffk.org> <20040307063708.GD18129@bubble.modra.org> <20040307073023.GA13420@redhat.com> <20040309050531.GG28377@bubble.modra.org> <20040309075945.GA25201@redhat.com> <20040309234922.GM28377@bubble.modra.org>

	The PowerPC changes are okay with me.

	Other ports, such as Mips, use the IBM extended format, why not
just add dconstm0 to standard list in real.h instead of creating a special
function for rs6000 port?

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Powerpc64 long double support
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]