This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Make a few functions static

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 10:07:35 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make a few functions static
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20040301094217.GA8882@fencepost> <40481C15.50109@specifixinc.com> <40495B31.8070705@codesourcery.com> <20040306190737.GB18172@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:

On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:01:37PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:

Actually, is this still a requirement?

Stylistically, yes. It's confusing otherwise.

Not to me, but I guess it depends on what you're used to. :-)

I was going to make some alternate suggestions, but then I realized how much time we'd all waste talking about this bit of trivia...

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com

References:
- [PATCH] Make a few functions static
  - From: Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] Make a few functions static
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH] Make a few functions static
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] Make a few functions static
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]