This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Give a better error for PCH with exec-shield-randomize


On Mar  4, 2004, Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> wrote:

> It might be slightly complex, but I don't think it's all that fragile.

It is.  Just like the original approach of using MAP_FIXED.  MAP_FIXED
opens the door to all sorts of oddities.  When you ask the kernel to
map something on a fixed location, it will often assume you know what
you're doing, and map it even if it overlaps with other data you've
mapped before.  I think the right solution for this problem is to not
use MAP_FIXED, and cope with getting an address different from what
you requested by either relocating the pointers or giving up.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]