This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: head: MIPS: Workaround an R4000SC/MC branch/divide erratum


On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> >  I don't think so -- I didn't made any changes to the comment.
> 
> Note that I said "on-list".  Like I said, the patch I committed was
> exactly what you sent me.  I just wanted to give a heads-up to others
> on the gcc-patches list that the comment had changed since the last
> public posting.

 Yep, indeed.

> >  BTW, I've just wondered if we should obey "-fno-delayed-branch" here, for
> > consistency if not anything else.
> 
> IMO, no.  Fixed-form patterns have unconditionally used branch delay
> slots for a long time.  E.g. the !TARGET_64BIT versions of the shift
> patterns.  Not that I'm strongly against changing it...

 I wouldn't give it a priority, either.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]