This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
- From: Mostafa Hagog <MUSTAFA at il dot ibm dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: Ayal Zaks <zaks at il dot ibm dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:41:33 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] GCSE after reload - resubmit (SPECint +1.5% fp -0.5%).
Roger Sayle <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on 25/02/2004 15:31:32:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Mostafa Hagog wrote:
> > So I need approval for cvs write access.
> In the meantime, I'd suggest that you repost the patch with all of the
> necessary corrections, so that I or someone else with CVS write access
> can commit it for you.
Thanks in advanced.
> My personal opinion is that a contributor needs to demonstrate a full
> understanding of contribute.html before I'll personally sponsor their
> request for CVS write access. Given that I fixed numerous style issues
> before committing your last patch, you've yet to post a non-trivial
> contribution that meets all of GCC's submission requirements.
Sorry if it seemed that I have ignored your comments, it seems that
I have get confused and send an older version of the patch.
> Other maintainers may disagree, and should feel free to sponsor your
> request themselves. I have no objections whatsoever if they're happy
> to do so. If its any consolation, I'd had nearly 20 patches approved
> to GCC before being granted CVS write access myself. But perhaps
> policies have relaxed somewhat since then.
That is fine with me; When I asked for a write access, my intention was
to provide help not to get a privilege that I don't deserve.
> My apologies if this seems inconvenient. Most other contributors have
> to go through the additional process of personal copyright assignments
> before getting even this far!
I have already went through that.