This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch for constant expression constraints in preprocessor

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:00:40 +0000
Subject: Re: Patch for constant expression constraints in preprocessor
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402111943230.19297@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20040211231535.GA24536@daikokuya.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402112335480.20615@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:-

> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Neil Booth wrote:
> 
> > I don't believe we follow 265 (and personally have no intention of
> > doing so - it seems daft not to follow target arithmetic).  Nor
> > does EDG from what I can tell.
> > 
> > Unless I misunderstand.
> 
> I think we do follow 265 and have done so ever since cpp learnt the
> different between host and target intmax_t.  That is, cpp arithmetic is

Oh, OK, I misunderstood.  That's good.

Neil.

References:
- Patch for constant expression constraints in preprocessor
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Patch for constant expression constraints in preprocessor
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Patch for constant expression constraints in preprocessor
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]