This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Some numbers... (Re: [v3] String: centralize exp growth policy)

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 02:11:38 +0100
Subject: Re: Some numbers... (Re: [v3] String: centralize exp growth policy)
References: <401791E6.30901@suse.de> <4017B4EA.8070606@suse.de> <20040128115120.0170e8c4.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

3_4-branch
----------
6.540u 10.440s 0:17.66 96.1%    0+0k 0+0io 202pf+0w
mainline
--------
0.110u 0.030s 0:00.14 100.0%    0+0k 0+0io 201pf+0w
So, probably we want to have this change for 3_4 too right?
Nice! So, yes.

Agreed. A few more days of testing in mainline and I will!

Paolo.

P.S. That testcase is from Meyers, perhaps a not yet so widespread
idiom, but still something that Scott considers interesting (me too!)
and which can likely become more common in the near future.

References:
- [v3] String: centralize exp growth policy
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Some numbers... (Re: [v3] String: centralize exp growth policy)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Some numbers... (Re: [v3] String: centralize exp growth policy)
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]