This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o

From: neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:58:32 +0000
Subject: Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
References: <orad4rqiln.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <4004F0B9.2080402@bothner.com> <oreku2z7cq.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <40059EEB.9080903@bothner.com> <or1xq2z2h4.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <4005BDEF.6020600@bothner.com> <orfzeh7tzl.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:-

> compiler that has just been built?  The beauty of these tools is that
> you can tell them to run whatever compiler you like, and they just
> work.  Asking for them to be configured for different compilers would
> make them a major pain to use.

Presumably all compilers implement your CPP hack?

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: -save-temps still produces different .s and .o
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]