This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] TREE_ADDRESSABLE versus ARRAY_TYPE

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:00:34AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> + static tree
> + discover_nonconstant_array_refs_r (tree * tp, int *walk_subtrees,
> + 				   void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> + {
> +   tree t = *tp;
> +   if (TYPE_P (t) || DECL_P (t))
> +     *walk_subtrees = 0;
> +   else if (TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_REF)
> +     {
> +       while ((TREE_CODE (t) == ARRAY_REF
> + 	      && is_gimple_min_invariant (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1)))
> + 	     || (TREE_CODE (t) == COMPONENT_REF
> + 		 || TREE_CODE (t) == REALPART_EXPR
> + 		 || TREE_CODE (t) == IMAGPART_EXPR))
> + 	t = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
> +       t = get_base_symbol (t);
> +       if (t && DECL_P (t))
> + 	TREE_ADDRESSABLE (t) = 1;

This will mark *any* array_ref addressable, not just non-constant.
Look at your logic again.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]