This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: <addr_expr <realpart_expr <x>>> ?

On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 20:05, Richard Henderson wrote:

> Expanding complex operations just before SRA would probably do
> what we want.  It would eliminate enough dead code that we 
> wouldn't waste time.
> 
How about removing COMPLEX_TYPE, COMPLEX_CST and COMPLEX_EXPR from
tree.def?  Have the parser turn __complex__ into 'struct complex { <t>
real; <t> imag }'.

But in the end, anything that stops COMPLEX_* from getting into the
optimizers is fine with me.


Diego.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]