This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR 11350

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>,Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:59:23 +0100
Subject: Re: PR 11350
References: <20040110214807.GS1964@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040110152337.A1000@redhat.com> <20040110233850.GF20577@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040111014045.B8677@redhat.com> <20040111104932.GB4154@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040111025201.A23403@redhat.com> <20040111105357.GC4154@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040111025747.A13258@redhat.com>

> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:53:57AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > But the read in code segment itself may trap on some architectures?
> 
> Will we read from the code segment?  I thought we'd just load the
> address...

It probably depends on what pseudo got spilled, whether the address
pseudo or the destination pseudo...  Not sure what happens in the
particular testcase.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- PR 11350
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: PR 11350
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]