This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New bootstrap failure on ARM systems
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:10:25 +0000
- Subject: Re: New bootstrap failure on ARM systems
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
>
> > > stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/work/rearnsha/gnu/testinstall/arm-netbsdelf/bin/
> > > -c -O2 -g -mcpu=strongarm -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
> > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long
> > > -Wold-style-definition -Werror -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I.
> > > -I. -I/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc -I/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/.
> > > -I/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/../include -I../intl print-rtl1.c -o
> > > print-rtl1.o
> > > print-rtl1.c: In function `print_rtx':
> > > print-rtl1.c:616: internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start,
> > > at flow.c:546
> >
> > Hmm, that sounds like problem with conditional execution and
> > bbreordering. This may be the reason why things were ordered the other
> > way around than it would be natural. Do you have some kind of testcase?
> >
Is this going to be fixed soon, or would you rather that I reverted the
patch? It's been impossible to bootstrap the trunk on ARM for nearly a
week now, which at this stage the development process really isn't an
acceptable situation.
R.