This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, cagney at gnu dot org, kettenis at chello dot nl, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com
- Date: 06 Jan 2004 14:04:51 -0800
- Subject: Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64?
- References: <OFEA5CA921.302AEEB5-ON41256E00.005FB141@de.ibm.com><200312182258.hBIMwgT25422@makai.watson.ibm.com><200312201527.hBKFRHgI000712@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org><3FF5A069.1040306@gnu.org><200401022317.i02NHQBR001191@desire.geoffk.org><20040106152710.GB2533@bubble.modra.org><200401061807.i06I7Uu7015387@desire.geoffk.org><200401061809.i06I9vT26150@makai.watson.ibm.com>
David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:
> >>>>> Geoff Keating writes:
>
> Geoff> Why is DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER in sysv4.h instead of rs6000.h?
>
> Because only Dwarf2 register numbering is being fixed to conform
> to the ABI mapping. The register numbering for Stabs is correct.
Then, doesn't this patch break stabs under ELF?
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>