This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Your changes to ada/Make-lang.in and stamp-xgnatug
- From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
- To: Kelley Cook <kcook34 at ford dot com>
- Cc: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:39:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: Your changes to ada/Make-lang.in and stamp-xgnatug
- References: <20040105163056.A10487@dublin.act-europe.fr> <3FF99279.8070503@ford.com>
> I did recieve your message via GCC-Patches. I am in the process of
> moving, so my old email address is dead.
OK. Please update your alias at gcc.gnu.org and add yourself to MAINTAINERS,
thanks.
> I'll admit that there is an ugliness in the patch whose purpose is to no
> longer require xgnatug to be built and all the .texi and .info files to
> be rebuilt for every bootstrap as they did previous to my patch. As the
> comment notes, I couldn't think of a good way around the issue without
> requiring Make 3.80, hence the stampfile ugliness.
Why not simply putting the stamp file in the obj dir ? Wouldn't this work ?
> As previously requested I cc'd you on the patches, which were approved
> by the makefile maintainer. You did not object, so I applied them.
That's fine. The patch was sent not too long before the christmas period,
which is why I didn't review it at the time. It's never too late anyway.
Arno