This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] invoke.texi: Remove traces of dead ports.

From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
To: gp at suse dot de
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 10:14:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [patch] invoke.texi: Remove traces of dead ports.
References: <20040103.075725.55506278.kazu@cs.umass.edu><Pine.LNX.4.58.0401051432190.2661@D209.suse.de>

Hi Gerald,

> > 2004-01-02  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
> > 
> > 	* doc/invoke.texi: Remove traces of dead ports.
> 
> Yes, this looks fine.  Thanks!

Thanks.  Applied.

> >  @c break page here to avoid unsightly interparagraph stretch.
> >  @c -zw, 2001-8-17
> >  @page
> 
> Does this page break still apply?

Yes.  I don't know exactly what "unsightly interparagraph stretch"
means.  I am guessing it's a paragraph split into two consecutive
pages.  The first set of RS/6000 options documented contains 12 of
them, followed by many paragraphs, which takes more than one page.

Kazu Hirata

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] invoke.texi: Remove traces of dead ports.
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- [patch] invoke.texi: Remove traces of dead ports.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] invoke.texi: Remove traces of dead ports.
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]