This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [lno] fix division by zero

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>,Dorit Naishlos <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>,Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>,Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:53:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [lno] fix division by zero
References: <OFF30C0A56.97487BB8-ONC2256E11.002A0008-C2256E11.002E002D@il.ibm.com><16D39DF3-3ECE-11D8-8BAF-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org><1073233813.3019.38.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 10:53, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>> Yeah, i'm considering adding TDF_debug to go along with TDF_details and 
>> TDF_stats
>> 
> But why?  TDF_details already means "every stinking detail".  Unless we
> want to have degrees of detail which I'm not sure is worth it.

Ok, I'll use TDF_DETAILS - and we can always change it later-on if
needed...

Cheers,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lno] fix division by zero
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- Re: [lno] fix division by zero
  - From: Dorit Naishlos
- Re: [lno] fix division by zero
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [lno] fix division by zero
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]