This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Ada 3.3] Backport compilation fixes
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Dec 2003 20:34:17 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Ada 3.3] Backport compilation fixes
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <10312171854.AA04524@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:
| If Ada folks think that ability to build previous versions of GNAT
| with recent bootstrapping compilers is of no value for their
| community, I see no reason to endorse that initiative -- even though
| I can fully see the benefits for GCC developers.
|
| I don't want to speak for Arno, but it didn't sound like that's what he
| was saying. My interpretation was that he was expressing concern that,
| in general, compiling GNAT with a newer version of the compiler was something
| that's dubious. But if it can be made to work in a particular case,
| there's no reason not to do it.
OK. Thanks for the clarification.
The issue here is whether it is OK by Ada maintainers to have a patch
that makes GNAT/GCC-3.3.x buildable by a bootstrapping from GCC-3.4.
If that is not OK, is it OK to have the configury machinery disable
Ada by default? I can make decisions either way, but I would prefer
to have a clear statement from Ada maintainers -- because that may
settle some bugs as regression in future versions of GCC.
-- Gaby