This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Fix (hopefully) x86_64 bootstrap failure

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:11:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Fix (hopefully) x86_64 bootstrap failure
References: <200312140142.hBE1g6sV018363@speedy.slc.redhat.com><1071366537.3123.30.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 20:42, law@redhat.com wrote:
>
>> This makes flow.i build with an x86_64 cross compiler and hopefully brings
>> it back to bootstrapping status.

I'll give it a try now.  Thanks!

> Odd that today's bootstraps on my x86-64 box worked fine.  Andreas, did
> this fail building a multilibbed toolchain?  My box is incapable of
> doing multilib builds :/

I'm using a multi-libbed chain but this failed AFAIR with 64-bit
code.  Perhaps different checking attributes.

> Similarly with PPC.  Today's bootstrap worked just fine.  Oh, well.

PPC?  Or PPC64?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [tree-ssa] Fix (hopefully) x86_64 bootstrap failure
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] Fix (hopefully) x86_64 bootstrap failure
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]