This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:05:42 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Use accessor macros for the head and end of a basic block
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <20031208220915.GA32401@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka write
s:
>> Opinions? Should I finish this patch or is this just a big no-no?
>
>I think it is right thing to do. How will the tree counterparts called?
>Perhaps we can use BLOCK_HEAD_RTL/BLOCK_HEAD_TREE to make naming more
>conventient.
I would _strongly_ recommend this go into the mainline first, otherwise
we're going to create a lot of gratutious changes which makes merging
(both to the branch and eventually to the mainline) a lot more work than
it ought to be.
jeff