This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to gcc/resource.c for PR target/13256, CRIS, SH, reorg, dbr, strict_low_part.
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: zack at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, scox at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:29:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: Patch to gcc/resource.c for PR target/13256, CRIS, SH, reorg, dbr, strict_low_part.
> From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:36:18 -0800
> Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com> writes:
> > I'm a bit distressed finding that mark_set_resources (and
> > resource.c) is only used by the delayed-branch pass.
>
> The other passes have better ways of doing the same thing (e.g.:
> flow.c:init_propagate_block_info). It would be nice to be rid of
> resource.c entirely.
That's one of the changes I hope to allude to by "a presumed
reorg.c rewrite". I didn't consider that as a fix for this bug,
however, mostly because we're in stage 3. Since you're a global
maintainer replying to a patch, did you mean to imply that you'd
prefer to approve such a change rather than this patch at this
time? 1/2 ;-)
brgds, H-P