This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] More memory reductions


rIn message <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311241111140.13876@D209.suse.de>, Gerald Pfeifer 
wri
tes:
 >On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 law@redhat.com wrote:
 >> As I outlined in a previous message, SSA_NAMEs aren't real space
 >> efficient.  Right now they are 32 bytes in size [...]
 >> The net result is the size of an SSA_NAME node is now 24bytes and
 >> fits into the special case 24 byte page in the GC allocator.
 >
 >That's reduction by 33% -- excellent!
 >
 >> In my runs, we allocate over 888466 SSA_NAMEs so getting them from the
 >> 32byte page to the 24byte page is a significant amount of memory.
 >
 >What did you use for these runs? PR8361 or something else?
I'm testing with PR8361.
jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]