This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A polite ping for pending patches.
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: Kelley Cook <kelleycook at wideopenwest dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mmitchell at codesourcery dot com
- Date: 21 Nov 2003 12:13:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: A polite ping for pending patches.
- References: <3FBE4EF8.9000501@ford.com>
Kelley Cook <kcook34@ford.com> writes:
> I have two pending patches in my queue:
>
> The first one is a proposed resolution for the PR/12744 regression
> which will re-enable release tarballs to be built without having
> makeinfo, bison or flex. Joseph Myers gave a few comments on it,
> which I then included into the patch. It was never blessed with a
> final OK, though.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg00366.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg00381.html (additional
> portion requested by Joseph)
>
> This second patch almost falls into the obvious category. It just
> adjusts some .cvsignore files since after fixing PR/10996, these files
> no longer are built in the source directory.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg00679.html
>
> OK to install them?
This one is OK.
I'm not sure about the release-script stuff, I'd rather someone else
look at that (maybe Mark?).
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>