This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: New V3 demangler
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Er, not quite true. Look up the threads on libiberty "ownership" and
> copyright stuff; there has been some debate about libiberty being
> "part of" gcc, vs "used by" gcc (and many other projects). It affects
> the type of copyright assignment papers we need to let folks edit the
> file. We might as well get this one right the first time ;-)
How are the SC (and FSF lawyers if necessary) getting on with resolving
these issues? Nathanael's analysis
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg01286.html> was marked for the
attention of the SC but I don't recall a subsequent pronouncement or
detailed instructions on what assignments are needed in what cases.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk