This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] darwin shared/dylibed library support
- From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:50:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] darwin shared/dylibed library support
- References: <3FBA5EC5.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Geoff Keating wrote:
I'm back again with this patch.
Last time posted it I got a partly approval but I was not happy with
since the libgcj testsuite blocked my machine. This was under darwin6.3.
Now I run darwin7.0.0 and the situation has improved. Well, on
darwin7.0.0 it is the only way to get the libgcj run. With a static
build of libgcj I end up here:
With this patch applied you can see the results here:
I made a test on the host_os to see if we can build libgcj dylibed or
not. This is to distinguish between OS-X 10.2 and 10.3.
Hopefully it is ok. I know, it's a bit late for 3.4, but now it's upon
you to decide whether if it is welcome in 3.4 or not :)
This is OK, please commit it.
There are some small fixes I test right now. Pointed out by Andrew P.
(multilib, which does not exist anymore, install path of libgcc_s.dylib)
Regarding the libjava and libstdc++ people, I apologize not having sent
the patch to these lists. I made the assumption that most of them read
the gcc-patches too.
Also, I only modified some *.exp in libjava and libstdc++. I hope they
are ok. Otherwise I immediately revert.
Thank you again.
Ready to be flamed :)