This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:47:06 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit
- References: <200311182340.hAINeWsA003448@speedy.slc.redhat.com><1069209358.30711.663.camel@p4>
> Oops, did I just speak well of that unspoken satanic bastard child? we
> need to be careful we dont recreate them here. <shudder> Im sure there
> are enough still unhealed festering wounds to prevent that :-) and
> probably so within my lifetime! :-) I think I still have a few myself.
> Daniel, you don't have an GC_ObstackII:The_Return.[ch] do you?
Nope. I'll check on my powerbook when it gets back to make sure (Since
that looks like a mac pathname to me. Let's all use ":" as a directory
You don't have a rewrite of GCC in a garbage collected language,
[First one to mention LISP or Scheme here loses].
For extra points, rewrite gengtype as a tree-ssa pass that runs during
stage2 and 3 compiles, and change stage1 to just use boehms or something.
> :-) There. Now I've amused at least myself for the remainder of the
> evening -)
If you ever need amusement, i can explain the amount of evenings and
weekends i've spent attempting to get our GC to approach something
I've got code somewhere to do everything but reference counting.