This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit


On Wednesday 19 November 2003 01:13, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <200311172002.46751.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>, Steven
> Bosscher
>
> writes:
>  > PR8361 is a good example.  Basically, _any_ C++ file with lots of
>  > templates is
>  >a good example.
>  >
>  >(probably because we cannot collect garbage after lowering and
>  > tree-optimizat ion???)
>
> Well, I'm not immediately aware of a reason why we couldn't collect
> after lowering, then again after tree-optimization.

I've tried this and it fails, so apparently lowering isn't completely GC safe 
either.  Need to find out why...

Gr.
Steven



> We can't collect
> between the tree optimizers as we haven't made the effort to make sure
> they're GC safe.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]