This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: RFA Fix C/13014
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 13:15, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > *sigh* no. Stupid nested functions. gack. Though, entertainingly, it
> > doesn't trip the abort I put in either. I would have thought it would.
> > Does this trip with mainline right now?
> Here's one which does trip with mainline now - the previous one seems to
> show a separate bug.
Hrm. I can leave the original error messages in (which this will
obviously trip since I get an abort with my patch installed). It'd save
the effort of having to worry about saving and restoring state in the
parser. The only other way I can think to fix the testcase would be a
routine that does a tree walk especially for these two cases (break and
continue) - that's _just_ what we need. Something else to slow down the
It does offend my sense of tidiness though.
Eric Christopher <email@example.com>