This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
so I didn't test the patch for PR2294.
Sure, because the patch was never backported to the 3.3 branch. It was only
applied to mainline.
Oh, yeah. I keep forgetting about that one... :)
A quick test to determine whether libjava is broken is to run the C++
testsuite. If you see hundreds of failures, then libjava is very likely
FWIW, the problem with my patch was exactly this, it caused no regressions
in the C++ testsuite but still broke libgcj.
libgcj might possibly be at fault here... Does your patch have the
side-effect of thightening semantic checks on overloaded functions?
Many thanks to Bernardo for taking care of the CVS hand-work for me.
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.