This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>,"Bernardo Innocenti" <bernie at develer dot com>
Cc: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,"GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:31:33 +0100
Subject: Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
References: <3FB68E4E.6060308@develer.com> <200311152348.15631.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <3FB6DBAB.1080006@develer.com> <200311160921.04345.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> wrote:

>[3.3 branch]
> so I didn't test the patch for PR2294.

Sure, because the patch was never backported to the 3.3 branch. It was only
applied to mainline.

> A quick test to determine whether libjava is broken is to run the C++
> testsuite. If you see hundreds of failures, then libjava is very likely
> broken.

FWIW, the problem with my patch was exactly this, it caused no regressions
in the C++ testsuite but still broke libgcj.

Many thanks to Bernardo for taking care of the CVS hand-work for me.

Giovanni Bajo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]